Hi, I would like to benefit from standard HTTP cache behaviour.
That is, ask for the same url and observe the browser pick up the object from its cache.
However, I observe that when I use flashembed. It appends a querystring with a random number after the swf object
e.g
if I'm looking to retrievehttp://example.org/test.swf, when I observe the request/response via HTTPScoop or Fiddler or Firebug I see the following request
http://example.org/test.swf?0.75603134
I would like to understand why the random string is generated behind the scene.
Static Asset Versioning should be done by the web site designer via different mechanisms
That is, ask for the same url and observe the browser pick up the object from its cache.
However, I observe that when I use flashembed. It appends a querystring with a random number after the swf object
e.g
if I'm looking to retrievehttp://example.org/test.swf, when I observe the request/response via HTTPScoop or Fiddler or Firebug I see the following request
http://example.org/test.swf?0.75603134
I would like to understand why the random string is generated behind the scene.
Static Asset Versioning should be done by the web site designer via different mechanisms
